Frustrated

Profile
Forum Nick	Frustrated
Registered	Thu 22/Jul/2010, 4:43pm

Topics by Frustrated

Comments by Frustrated
1	Dissatisfied With Asset First Sdn Bhd - Wed 11/Aug/2010 10:43pm TSK how do we get in touch with u?
2	Dissatisfied With Asset First Sdn Bhd - Mon 9/Aug/2010 9:27pm Yes i agree with Eugene 3's comment #66 above, we may be signing our rights away. What do u mean there r is no more AF office? Pls elaborate on why u say that.
3	Dissatisfied With Asset First Sdn Bhd - Thu 29/Jul/2010 1:31am FYI, those guys in Asset first are aware of this forum & our posts. We dun remember having signed any Deed of Assignment (DOA). When we paid the legal fees & fees to Asset First, we trusted them to do a gd job for us & for the lawyer to represent us as they hv a fiduciary duty to client. Even AFSB has a legal bound duty to clients. According to many legal sources, SD is only to be signed by the person who makes declaration & attested by Commissioner of Oath. Why are we required to sign it. The contents of the "SD" is very impt. Be sure of what u sign. Guys, pls quickly email yr contact to Ant scm 2.
4	Dissatisfied With Asset First Sdn Bhd - Sun 25/Jul/2010 11:53pm Guys, does anyone know about the other lawyer, Jagmohan Singh & Associates? Since we are now aware of the 'joy ride', pls quickly email yr contacts to Anti scm's email above. Thereafter, we shld meetup to decide next course of action. Do not wait until Aug 10 for them to so call "pay us". We nd to discuss & have various options at hand (in the event they dont pay us in Aug 10) as they can continue to give us stories going forward. If we work together collectively, its better than each one of us taking single action.
5	Dissatisfied With Asset First Sdn Bhd - Thu 22/Jul/2010 11:46pm Thx Anti scam2, kindly gv us few days notice b4 we meetup. Yes we all want to get back our capital soonest possible. Seeking legal opinion does not necessarily mean that we ll take legal action agst them at this point in time. For eg, It also encompasses legal opinion on whether the SD docs or any doc is detrimental to us if we sign.Lets us all think of various questions to facilitate our discussion when we meetup.
6	Dissatisfied With Asset First Sdn Bhd - Thu 22/Jul/2010 5:09pm Thx to Anti scam2 for starting this forum. Im totally frustrated with whats been happening so far. There are lots of inconsistencies in the stories given by this co. We too hv checked with Bank Negara Malaysia, & according to them, they havent freeze anyone's accounts in respect to Asset First &/or its investing members/residents. BNM hv suggested that we get legal advice as this is under "cheating" case, not under BNM jurisdiction. Thus, what they hv been telling us so far is not true. Maybe like what Messi said, the money from lawyer's trust has been absconded. We wont know. Further, in a Statutory Declaration, theres only one party who signs it, ie the person who makes the declaration. This shld be Asset First/Paramjit, & NOT us. We need to becareful of what we sign as we may sign our rights away. We hv been given all sorts of excuses over the last one year, ranging to lawyer delay to BNM investigations. These appear to be buying more time in their favour. We dun know what new excuses will be given. Maybe next excuse wud be, SSM is investigating them & another delay for few years? We shldnt just sit & hope. We shld do the following:- 1) We all need to meet up amongst ourselves to discuss our situation & how to solve this issue smartly & not at the mercy of this co. Maybe Anti scam 2 can gather our contact emails & HPs, & then plan a meetup to discuss further. 2) Thereafter, we shld engage a legal firm (& share its costs amongst ourselves) to seek our remedies because this comes under civil &/or criminal case (if there is criminal element in it). It is wise to seek legal opinions as we are dealing with this co & its chairman who is/was a lawyer. Can we all ask Anti scam 2 to organise a meetup first...?